Glauber de Oliveira Costa wrote:
> under paravirt, read cr2 cannot be issued directly anymore.
> So wrap it in a macro, defined to the operation itself in case
> paravirt is off, but to something else if we have paravirt
> in the game
>   

Is this actually needed?  It's only used in the early fault handler in
head_64.S.  Will we be taking that path in the paravirt case?  If so,
should we disable the fault handler altogether, since the hypervisor can
probably provide better diagnositcs.

    J
> Signed-off-by: Glauber de Oliveira Costa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Acked-by: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kernel/head_64.S |    9 ++++++++-
>  1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/head_64.S b/arch/x86/kernel/head_64.S
> index b6167fe..c31b1c9 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/head_64.S
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/head_64.S
> @@ -19,6 +19,13 @@
>  #include <asm/msr.h>
>  #include <asm/cache.h>
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PARAVIRT
> +#include <asm/asm-offsets.h>
> +#include <asm/paravirt.h>
> +#else
> +#define GET_CR2_INTO_RCX movq %cr2, %rcx
> +#endif
> +
>  /* we are not able to switch in one step to the final KERNEL ADRESS SPACE
>   * because we need identity-mapped pages.
>   *
> @@ -267,7 +274,7 @@ ENTRY(early_idt_handler)
>       xorl %eax,%eax
>       movq 8(%rsp),%rsi       # get rip
>       movq (%rsp),%rdx
> -     movq %cr2,%rcx
> +     GET_CR2_INTO_RCX
>       leaq early_idt_msg(%rip),%rdi
>       call early_printk
>       cmpl $2,early_recursion_flag(%rip)
>   


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
kvm-devel mailing list
kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel

Reply via email to