Carsten Otte wrote: > Zhang, Xiantao wrote: >> Moving KVM_CHECK_EXTENSION case to arch, since different archs should >> have different capabilities. > I believe we want to keep the existence of the ioctl > KVM_CHECK_EXTENSION common. Just the extension flags should be arch > specific. This patch has the danger, that we might end up with > architectures that don't have KVM_CHECK_EXTENSION at all.
How about attached patch? Agree to keep this ioctl in common, and instead define an arch-specific function in x86. Xiantao
0006-KVM-Portability-move.patch
Description: 0006-KVM-Portability-move.patch
------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________ kvm-devel mailing list kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
