Izik Eidus wrote: > On Thu, 2007-11-15 at 18:52 +0800, Zhang, Xiantao wrote: >> Hi, all >> I have worked out a rough patch to split mmu code from >> kvm_main.c. Welcome comments! Currently, most of code wrt mmu are >> moved to arch, but one exception exists. In fucntion >> kvm_vm_ioctl_get_diry_log, I used KVM_CAP_MMU_SHADOW_CACHE_CONTROL >> to comment two lines. Can it be accepted? or good ideas? > wont it be better to do something like > kvm_vm_arch_ioctl_get_dirty_log() > that will call to something like: > kvm_common_ioctl_get_dirty_log() > ? Yes, we can handle this case in this way. :)
------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ kvm-devel mailing list kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
