On Nov 26, 2007 2:16 AM, Avi Kivity <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Neo Jia wrote: > > Avi Kivity wrote: > > > >> Neo Jia wrote: > >> > >>> On Nov 24, 2007 12:00 AM, Avi Kivity <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>>> Neo Jia wrote: > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>> The version of kvm I used for kvm module is > >>>>> "694401697ccd822bb08019731c3ee1bb34323d8e" and the kvm-userspace is > >>>>> "a57b838b49bc4e4e7439b18d0323385d53e41c7f". > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> These are very recent versions, but the nature of the problem leads me > >>>> to expect you are using the host's kvm modules. Can you verify? > >>>> > >>>> > >>> Yes. Just verified that I ran the modules from kernel "2.6.23.1-49.fc8". > >>> > >>> But according to Sheng's comments, I also don't see the "cld" > >>> instruction in the latest version. > >>> > >>> Why does kvm not crash? > >>> > >>> > >>> > >> With the reset fix, kvm never sees the cld instruction. It executes > >> the jmp instruction at f000:fff0 and continues processing ROM code. > >> > >> > > Do we need to add a "default" in x86 emulator switch statement? > > > > > > Take a look at the code. That path is already covered.
Avi, I just checkout the latest kvm.git. Please correct me if I am wrong. I don't see the explicit "default" in swtich (c->b) statement but I found a goto writeback. Is that one? Thanks, Neo > > > > -- > error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function > > -- I would remember that if researchers were not ambitious probably today we haven't the technology we are using! ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ kvm-devel mailing list kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
