Christian Ehrhardt wrote:
> Attached your patch 2/2 and my 3/2 merged.
> As you said the renaming patch is not essential, but I prefer names as 
> clear as possible which would be with renaming patch.
> As 4/2 still applies after this merged one we can just let Avi apply 
> whatever he likes from this series ;-)
> 
> Zhang, Xiantao wrote:
>> Thanks, sure to move it out. Maybe you can update my second patch
>> directly for Avi's easy maintenance. 
> [...]
> 
> ---
> 
> From: Zhang Xiantao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> From: Christian Ehrhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 10:54:00 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] [2/2] merged_move_kvm_vpu_cache_to_x86
> 
> Moving kvm_vcpu_cache to x86.c, since only x86 platform will use to 
> align the memory area for fx_save. To prevent misuse of these x86 
> structure in generic code the definition moved from kvm.h to x86.h.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christian Ehrhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Acked-by: Carsten Otte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by: The Future of Linux Business White Paper
from Novell.  From the desktop to the data center, Linux is going
mainstream.  Let it simplify your IT future.
http://altfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/8857-50307-18918-4
_______________________________________________
kvm-devel mailing list
kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel

Reply via email to