Carsten Otte wrote: > Avi Kivity wrote: >> Why is that? Do other archs not want kvm_vcpu_cache, or is it just the >> alignment? > On s390, our nice colleagues in the hardware depeartment take care of > caching vcpu related data on a phyical one. No need to do anything for > us in that area, except enjoying the benefits. This time, we don't > even have to call an instruction for that :-). >
But you do need the vcpu cache, right? -- Do not meddle in the internals of kernels, for they are subtle and quick to panic. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: The Future of Linux Business White Paper from Novell. From the desktop to the data center, Linux is going mainstream. Let it simplify your IT future. http://altfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/8857-50307-18918-4 _______________________________________________ kvm-devel mailing list kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
