Rusty, Anthony, Dor,

I need your brain power :-)

On smp guests I have seen a problem with virtio (the version in curent Avi's
git) which do not occur on single processor guests:

kernel BUG at /space/kvm/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c:228!
illegal operation: 0001 [#1]
Modules linked in: ipv6
CPU:    2    Not tainted
Process swapper (pid: 0, task: 000000000f83e038, ksp: 000000000f877d70)
Krnl PSW : 0704000180000000 000000000045df2a (vring_restart+0x5a/0x70)
           R:0 T:1 IO:1 EX:1 Key:0 M:1 W:0 P:0 AS:0 CC:0 PM:0 EA:3
Krnl GPRS: 00000000c0a80101 0000000000000000 000000000eb35000 0000000010005800
           000000000045ded0 000000000000192f 000000000eb21000 000000000eb21000
           000000000000000e 000000000eb21900 000000000eb21920 000000000f867cb8
           0700000000d9b058 0000000000000010 000000000045c06a 000000000f867cb8
Krnl Code: 000000000045df1e: e3b0b0700004       lg      %r11,112(%r11)
           000000000045df24: 07fe               bcr     15,%r14
           000000000045df26: a7f40001           brc     15,45df28
          >000000000045df2a: a7f4ffe1           brc     15,45deec
           000000000045df2e: e31020300004       lg      %r1,48(%r2)
           000000000045df34: a7480000           lhi     %r4,0
           000000000045df38: 96011001           oi      1(%r1),1
           000000000045df3c: a7f4ffef           brc     15,45df1a
Call Trace:
([<000000000045c016>] virtnet_poll+0x96/0x42c)
 [<000000000048cda2>] net_rx_action+0xca/0x150
 [<0000000000137f7a>] __do_softirq+0x9e/0x130
 [<00000000001105d6>] do_softirq+0xae/0xb4
 [<0000000000138182>] irq_exit+0x96/0x9c
 [<000000000010d710>] do_extint+0xcc/0xf8
 [<00000000001135d0>] ext_no_vtime+0x16/0x1a
 [<000000000010a57e>] cpu_idle+0x216/0x238


I think there is a valid code path, triggering this bug:

        CPU1                                            CPU2
-----------------------                         -----------------------
- virtnet_poll found no
  more packets on queue
- netif_rx_complete allow
  poll to be called
- vq_ops->restart is called
- vq Interrupts are enabled     
        .                    <new packets arrive>
<vcpu is scheduled away>
        .                                       - interrupt is delivered
        .                                       - poll is called
        .                                       - poll work is done
        .                                       - netif_rx_complete
        .                                       - vq_ops->restart is called
        .                                       - check if vq interrupts are
        .                                         enable --> BUG


The first idea was to remove this check? (See patch below). I am not sure
if the proper fix also requires to change vring.avail->flags to be only
changed by atomic bitops. Any ideas, comments?

Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: Anthony Liguori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: Dor Laor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: Rusty Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

---
 drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c |    2 --
 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)

Index: kvm/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
===================================================================
--- kvm.orig/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
+++ kvm/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
@@ -225,8 +225,6 @@ static bool vring_restart(struct virtque
        struct vring_virtqueue *vq = to_vvq(_vq);
 
        START_USE(vq);
-       BUG_ON(!(vq->vring.avail->flags & VRING_AVAIL_F_NO_INTERRUPT));
-
        /* We optimistically turn back on interrupts, then check if there was
         * more to do. */
        vq->vring.avail->flags &= ~VRING_AVAIL_F_NO_INTERRUPT;

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It's the best place to buy or sell services
for just about anything Open Source.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace
_______________________________________________
kvm-devel mailing list
kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel

Reply via email to