Laurent Vivier wrote:
> Le lundi 07 janvier 2008 à 11:27 +0200, Avi Kivity a écrit :
>   
>> Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon wrote:
>>     
>>> revert a merge conflict from 075da586c92f09bd9a7401f1e80d72fde27c173 that
>>> redefined sector as an array of pointers to char, instead of a statically
>>> allocated buffer of chars, that was triggering the following warnings :
>>>
>>> block.c: In function `bdrv_commit':
>>> block.c:480: warning: passing arg 3 of `bdrv_read' from incompatible 
>>> pointer type
>>> block.c:484: warning: passing arg 3 of `bdrv_write' from incompatible 
>>> pointer type
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>   
>>>       
>> Doesn't the cache=off option warrant an allocation here to ensure 
>> alignment (or perhaps a 1K stack buffer with runtime adjustment)?
>>     
>
> You're right, a good patch should be something like this (it is not
> tested or even compiled) :
>   

Looks good, but patch is corrupted by mail client.

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
kvm-devel mailing list
kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel

Reply via email to