[fixing gmane emails, urgfhsz] Andi Kleen wrote: > Avi Kivity <avi-atKUWr5tajBWk0Htik3J/[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >> Thanks; that's reassuring to know that it will work (at least on Intel). >> > > Actually there are modern Intel systems which still have instable TSCs; > e.g. IBM Summit multi node systems and some others. So you should > still handle that case. >
I really don't see any way we could. If the guest assumes tscs are synchronous, and they really are not, there's nothing we can do. [well, we could trap and emulate rdtsc, but performance would tank] You might taskset guests into a single node on such systems, which is a good idea anyway. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ kvm-devel mailing list kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
