On Wed, 23 Jan 2008, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > On Wed, Jan 23, 2008 at 04:52:47AM -0600, Robin Holt wrote: > > But 100 callouts holding spinlocks will not work for our implementation > > and even if the callouts are made with spinlocks released, we would very > > strongly prefer a single callout which messages the range to the other > > side. > > But you take the physical address and turn into mm+va with your rmap...
The remote mm+va or a local mm+va? ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ kvm-devel mailing list kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
