Avi Kivity wrote:
> Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
>
>> The remote page fault
>>
>>
>
> As we have two names for this ('shadow' and 'remote/export') I'd like to
> suggest a neutral nomenclature. How about 'secondary mmu' (and
> secondary ptes (sptes), etc.)? I think this fits xpmem, kvm, rdma, and dri.
>
>
Er, it was Robin who came up with this first, I see. Let's just say I
second the motion.
--
Any sufficiently difficult bug is indistinguishable from a feature.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
kvm-devel mailing list
kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
