On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 06:17:51PM +0100, Carsten Otte wrote: > Andrea Arcangeli wrote: >> Well I already moved that bit to x86, at least that had a good reason >> for being moved there, it's really invisible code to s390. The memslot >> are all but invisible to s390 instead, and so the locking rules of the >> memslots should be common as long as memslots remains a common-code >> data structure too IMHO. > That makes sense to me.
Ok thanks! ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ kvm-devel mailing list kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
