On Tue, 29 Jan 2008, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> > + mmu_notifier(invalidate_range, mm, address,
> > + address + PAGE_SIZE - 1, 0);
> > page_table = pte_offset_map_lock(mm, pmd, address, &ptl);
> > if (likely(pte_same(*page_table, orig_pte))) {
> > if (old_page) {
>
> What's the point of invalidate_range when the size is PAGE_SIZE? And
> how can it be right to invalidate_range _before_ ptep_clear_flush?
I am not sure. AFAICT you wrote that code.
It seems to be okay to invalidate range if you hold mmap_sem writably. In
that case no additional faults can happen that would create new ptes.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
kvm-devel mailing list
kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
