On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 11:41:29AM -0800, Christoph Lameter wrote: > On Wed, 30 Jan 2008, Jack Steiner wrote: > > > I see what you mean. I need to review to mail to see why this changed > > but in the original discussions with Christoph, the invalidate_range > > callouts were suppose to be made BEFORE the pages were put on the freelist. > > Seems that we cannot rely on the invalidate_ranges for correctness at all? > We need to have invalidate_page() always. invalidate_range() is only an > optimization. >
I don't understand your point "an optimization". How would invalidate_range as currently defined be correctly used? It _looks_ like it would work only if xpmem/gru/etc takes a refcnt on the page & drops it when invalidate_range is called. That may work (not sure) for xpmem but not for the GRU. --- jack ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ kvm-devel mailing list kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel