On Fri, Feb 01, 2008 at 05:35:28PM -0600, Robin Holt wrote: > No, we need a callout when we are becoming more restrictive, but not > when becoming more permissive. I would have to guess that is the case > for any of these callouts. It is for both GRU and XPMEM. I would > expect the same is true for KVM, but would like a ruling from Andrea on > that.
I still hope I don't need to take any lock in _range_start and that losing coherency (w/o risking global memory corruption but only risking temporary userland data corruption thanks to the page pin) is ok for KVM. If I would have to take a lock in _range_start like XPMEM is forced to do (GRU is by far not forced to it, if it would switch to my #v5) then it would be a problem. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ kvm-devel mailing list kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
