On Sun, Feb 17, 2008 at 04:57:36PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote: > Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > > Issue is the paravirt_ops code in Linux does not cover all pte updates > > (bit updates, ptep_get_and_clear, etc). > > > > The plan is to get the basic infrastructure merged into KVM first (which > > is a significant improvement already) and then later have paravirt_ops > > cover all updates, disabling write protection. > > > > Okay, sounds good. > > Do you know if anyone is working on extending pv_ops as you describe?
Not that I'm aware of. I was planning to do it. The first part of that is a mask based bit update hypercall (ie. a non-broken version of the patch I posted earlier which Jeremy replied to). ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ kvm-devel mailing list kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
