I'm the 'dsahern' in the bug report (that's my sourceforge login). Per the
thread below yes it is due to networking and as recently as 3 days ago it made a
bit of difference for Arne Kepp with his Centos 5 VM.

david


Avi Kivity wrote:
> Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 11:12:03AM +0100, Farkas Levente wrote:
>>   
>>>> You can workaround these problems by using a different, less problematic
>>>> clocksource such as acpipm, until the TSC/migration issues are fully
>>>> resolved.
>>>>
>>>> Add "clocksource=acpi_pm" to the kernel options.
>>>>       
>>> than just quck question we use the noapic kernel option for the guest (i
>>> don't remember why but there was some problem without it about half year
>>> ago). do i still have to use the noapic option for the kernel? (i hope
>>> somebody remember the reason:-)
>>>     
>> Apparently dsahern found that the noapic option fixed or alleviated
>> rtl8139 problems under high traffic:
>>
>> https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1802082&group_id=180599&atid=893831
>>
>>   
> 
> I've just run several hours with noapic to confirm.
> 
>> I don't know details of the problem or why noapic made a difference.
>>   
> 
> Seems to point the finger at the ioapic code.  Could be because the load 
> is lower with pic, though.
> 
> I've looked at the ioapic locking and it seems fine.
> 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
kvm-devel mailing list
kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel

Reply via email to