On Tue, 19 Feb 2008, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > Yes, that's why I kept maintaining my patch and I posted the last > revision to Andrew. I use pte/tlb locking of the core VM, it's > unintrusive and obviously safe. Furthermore it can be extended with > Christoph's stuff in a 100% backwards compatible fashion later if needed.
How would that work? You rely on the pte locking. Thus calls are all in an atomic context. I think we need a general scheme that allows sleeping when references are invalidates. Even the GRU has performance issues when using the KVM patch. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ kvm-devel mailing list kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
