On Thu, 28 Feb 2008, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > I'm not suggesting not to address the issues, just that those issues > requires VM core changes, and likely those changes should be > switchable under a CONFIG_XPMEM, so I see no reason to delay the mmu > notifier until those changes are done and merged too. It's kind of a > separate problem.
No its the core problem of the mmu notifier. It needs to be usable for a lot of scenarios. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ kvm-devel mailing list kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
