On Thu, 28 Feb 2008, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 02:43:41PM -0800, Christoph Lameter wrote: > > Nope. unmap_mapping_range is already handled by the range callbacks. > > But they're called with atomic=1 on anything but anonymous memory. I > understood Andrew asked to remove the atomic param and to allow > sleeping for all kind of vmas. I also understood certain XPMEM > customers asked to use XPMEM on something more than anonymous memory.
Yes but the patch that is discussed here does not handle that situation. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ kvm-devel mailing list kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
