On Tue, Mar 04, 2008 at 11:35:32AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > On Mon, 2008-03-03 at 13:15 -0600, Jack Steiner wrote: > > > I haven't thought about locking requirements for the radix tree. Most > > accesses > > would be read-only & updates infrequent. Any chance of an RCU-based radix > > implementation? Otherwise, don't we add the potential for hot > > locks/cachelines > > for threaded applications ??? > > The current radix tree implementation in the kernel is RCU capable. We > just don't have many RCU users yet.
Ahhh. You are right. I thought I looked but obviously missed it. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ kvm-devel mailing list kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
