Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Tue, 2008-03-04 at 14:35 -0800, Christoph Lameter wrote: > > >> RCU means that the callbacks occur in an atomic context. >> > > Not really, if it requires moving the VM locks to sleepable locks under > a .config option, I think its also fair to require PREEMPT_RCU. > > OTOH, if you want to unconditionally move the VM locks to sleepable > locks you have a point. >
Isn't that out of the question for .25? I really wish we can get the atomic variant in now, and add on sleepability in .26, updating users if necessary. -- Do not meddle in the internals of kernels, for they are subtle and quick to panic. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ kvm-devel mailing list kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
