The code for both arches are very similar, so this patch merge them.

Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/pci-dma.c    |   44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 arch/x86/kernel/pci-dma_32.c |   24 ----------------------
 arch/x86/kernel/pci-dma_64.c |   44 +-----------------------------------------
 3 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 67 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/pci-dma.c b/arch/x86/kernel/pci-dma.c
index f6d6a92..4289a9b 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/pci-dma.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/pci-dma.c
@@ -14,6 +14,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(forbid_dac);
 const struct dma_mapping_ops *dma_ops;
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(dma_ops);
 
+int iommu_sac_force __read_mostly = 0;
+
 #ifdef CONFIG_IOMMU_DEBUG
 int panic_on_overflow __read_mostly = 1;
 int force_iommu __read_mostly = 1;
@@ -33,6 +35,48 @@ int dma_set_mask(struct device *dev, u64 mask)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(dma_set_mask);
 
+int dma_supported(struct device *dev, u64 mask)
+{
+#ifdef CONFIG_PCI
+       if (mask > 0xffffffff && forbid_dac > 0) {
+               printk(KERN_INFO "PCI: Disallowing DAC for device %s\n",
+                                dev->bus_id);
+               return 0;
+       }
+#endif
+
+       if (dma_ops->dma_supported)
+               return dma_ops->dma_supported(dev, mask);
+
+       /* Copied from i386. Doesn't make much sense, because it will
+          only work for pci_alloc_coherent.
+          The caller just has to use GFP_DMA in this case. */
+       if (mask < DMA_24BIT_MASK)
+               return 0;
+
+       /* Tell the device to use SAC when IOMMU force is on.  This
+          allows the driver to use cheaper accesses in some cases.
+
+          Problem with this is that if we overflow the IOMMU area and
+          return DAC as fallback address the device may not handle it
+          correctly.
+
+          As a special case some controllers have a 39bit address
+          mode that is as efficient as 32bit (aic79xx). Don't force
+          SAC for these.  Assume all masks <= 40 bits are of this
+          type. Normally this doesn't make any difference, but gives
+          more gentle handling of IOMMU overflow. */
+       if (iommu_sac_force && (mask >= DMA_40BIT_MASK)) {
+               printk(KERN_INFO "%s: Force SAC with mask %Lx\n",
+                                dev->bus_id, mask);
+               return 0;
+       }
+
+       return 1;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(dma_supported);
+
+
 static int __init pci_iommu_init(void)
 {
 #ifdef CONFIG_CALGARY_IOMMU
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/pci-dma_32.c b/arch/x86/kernel/pci-dma_32.c
index 6543bb3..1d4091a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/pci-dma_32.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/pci-dma_32.c
@@ -155,30 +155,6 @@ void *dma_mark_declared_memory_occupied(struct device *dev,
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(dma_mark_declared_memory_occupied);
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_PCI
-/* Many VIA bridges seem to corrupt data for DAC. Disable it here */
-
-int
-dma_supported(struct device *dev, u64 mask)
-{
-       /*
-        * we fall back to GFP_DMA when the mask isn't all 1s,
-        * so we can't guarantee allocations that must be
-        * within a tighter range than GFP_DMA..
-        */
-       if (mask < 0x00ffffff)
-               return 0;
-
-       /* Work around chipset bugs */
-       if (forbid_dac > 0 && mask > 0xffffffffULL)
-               return 0;
-
-       if (dma_ops->dma_supported)
-               return dma_ops->dma_supported(dev, mask);
-
-       return 1;
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(dma_supported);
-
 static int check_iommu(char *s)
 {
        if (!strcmp(s, "usedac")) {
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/pci-dma_64.c b/arch/x86/kernel/pci-dma_64.c
index 7820675..c80da76 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/pci-dma_64.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/pci-dma_64.c
@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(bad_dma_address);
 int iommu_bio_merge __read_mostly = 0;
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(iommu_bio_merge);
 
-static int iommu_sac_force __read_mostly = 0;
+extern int iommu_sac_force;
 
 int no_iommu __read_mostly;
 /* Set this to 1 if there is a HW IOMMU in the system */
@@ -161,48 +161,6 @@ void dma_free_coherent(struct device *dev, size_t size,
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(dma_free_coherent);
 
-int dma_supported(struct device *dev, u64 mask)
-{
-#ifdef CONFIG_PCI
-       if (mask > 0xffffffff && forbid_dac > 0) {
-
-
-
-               printk(KERN_INFO "PCI: Disallowing DAC for device %s\n", 
dev->bus_id);
-               return 0;
-       }
-#endif
-
-       if (dma_ops->dma_supported)
-               return dma_ops->dma_supported(dev, mask);
-
-       /* Copied from i386. Doesn't make much sense, because it will
-          only work for pci_alloc_coherent.
-          The caller just has to use GFP_DMA in this case. */
-        if (mask < DMA_24BIT_MASK)
-                return 0;
-
-       /* Tell the device to use SAC when IOMMU force is on.  This
-          allows the driver to use cheaper accesses in some cases.
-
-          Problem with this is that if we overflow the IOMMU area and
-          return DAC as fallback address the device may not handle it
-          correctly.
-
-          As a special case some controllers have a 39bit address
-          mode that is as efficient as 32bit (aic79xx). Don't force
-          SAC for these.  Assume all masks <= 40 bits are of this
-          type. Normally this doesn't make any difference, but gives
-          more gentle handling of IOMMU overflow. */
-       if (iommu_sac_force && (mask >= DMA_40BIT_MASK)) {
-               printk(KERN_INFO "%s: Force SAC with mask %Lx\n", 
dev->bus_id,mask);
-               return 0;
-       }
-
-       return 1;
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(dma_supported);
-
 /*
  * See <Documentation/x86_64/boot-options.txt> for the iommu kernel parameter
  * documentation.
-- 
1.5.0.6


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference 
Register now and save $200. Hurry, offer ends at 11:59 p.m., 
Monday, April 7! Use priority code J8TLD2. 
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone
_______________________________________________
kvm-devel mailing list
kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel

Reply via email to