On Wed, 16 Apr 2008, Robin Holt wrote: > On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 11:35:38AM -0700, Christoph Lameter wrote: > > On Wed, 16 Apr 2008, Robin Holt wrote: > > > > > I don't think this lock mechanism is completely working. I have > > > gotten a few failures trying to dereference 0x100100 which appears to > > > be LIST_POISON1. > > > > How does xpmem unregistering of notifiers work? > > For the tests I have been running, we are waiting for the release > callout as part of exit.
Some more details on the failure may be useful. AFAICT list_del[_rcu] is the culprit here and that is only used on release or unregister. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone _______________________________________________ kvm-devel mailing list kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
