Carsten Otte wrote: > Anthony Liguori wrote: >> There is a 5th option. Do away with the use of posix aio. We get >> absolutely no benefit from it because it's limited to a single >> thread. Fabrice has reverted a patch to change that in the past. > How about using linux aio for it? It seems much better, because it > doesn't use userspace threads but has a direct in-kernel > implementation. I've had good performance on zldisk with that, and > it's stable.
Linux-aio is nice except that you can't easily complete network and disk requests simulateneously (no IO_CMD_POLL yet). This means you need an additional thread. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone _______________________________________________ kvm-devel mailing list kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
