On Wed, 23 Apr 2008, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > Yes, there's really no risk of races in this area after introducing > mm_lock, any place that mangles over ptes and doesn't hold any of the > three locks is buggy anyway. I appreciate the audit work (I also did > it and couldn't find bugs but the more eyes the better).
I guess I would need to merge some patches together somehow to be able to review them properly like I did before <sigh>. I have not reviewed the latest code completely. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone _______________________________________________ kvm-devel mailing list kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
