On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 4:15 AM, Gerd Hoffmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
>  >> >From what me and marcelo discussed, I think there's a possibility that
>  >> it has marginally something to do with precision of clock calculation.
>  >> Gerd's patches address that issues. Can somebody test this with those
>  >> patches (both guest and host), while I'm off ?
>  >
>  > Haven't seen Gerd's guest patches ?
>
>  I'm still busy cooking them up.  I've mentioned them in a mail, but they
>  didn't ran over the list (yet).  Stay tuned ;)
>
>  cheers,
>   Gerd
>

Just saw Gerd's patches flying around. Can anyone that is able to
reproduce this problem (a subgroup of human beings that does not
include me) test it with them applied?

If it still fails, please let me know asap

-- 
Glauber Costa.
"Free as in Freedom"
http://glommer.net

"The less confident you are, the more serious you have to act."

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference 
Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. 
Use priority code J8TL2D2. 
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone
_______________________________________________
kvm-devel mailing list
kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel

Reply via email to