Avi Kivity wrote:
> Now it uses %rsi instead of %esi, and any junk in the upper bits will
> cause the ja to be taken.
>
> We need to get a reduced testcase to the gcc folks, this is a serious
> bug. Any changes in the code to work around this would be fragile.
>
Avi,
I've now filed a bug in the upstream gcc database:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36040
And I came up with a reduced test case, available here:
http://people.redhat.com/clalance/rsi-test-case.tar.bz2
If I compile the code in the above and look at the disassembly, it shows the
problem; however, I can't reproduce the bug by actually running the code. I
suspect the %rsi register is always 0 when we start in this userland code, so I
never run into the bogus ja, but I just thought I'd mention it.
Chris Lalancette
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference
Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100.
Use priority code J8TL2D2.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone
_______________________________________________
kvm-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
