On Fri, 2008-04-25 at 09:00 -0500, Hollis Blanchard wrote: > On Friday 25 April 2008 00:56:01 Jerone Young wrote: > > This set of patches fixes 100% CPU usage when a guest is idle on PowerPC. > This time it uses common kvm functions to sleep the guest. > > Looking much better now, with just a few minor issues to correct. With these > patches applied, about how much CPU *does* an idling guest consume?
With the current patch *as is* idle guest are eating about 16% CPU. Better then 100%, but more then the other patch. I'll see if by removing the vcpu_loads & vcpu_puts if that goes down. > > By the way, you don't explicitly *unset* MSR[WE]. I think this works > implicitly because of the way we deliver interrupts; could you add a comment > explaining that? Yes it is unset implicity. I can add a comment on this. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone _______________________________________________ kvm-devel mailing list kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
