Avi Kivity wrote: > The patches look good, but pleasy copy Jeremy and virtualization@ for > patches which touch things outside kvm.
Will do for the next round. > It's perhaps better to reverse the order: first fix kvm to be > compatible, then merge the Xen and kvm implementations into a single one. Fixing kvm (guest side) would be copying parts of the xen guest code, so that doesn't make much sense to me ... cheers, Gerd -- http://kraxel.fedorapeople.org/xenner/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone _______________________________________________ kvm-devel mailing list kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
