Jan Kiszka wrote: > This still leaves me with the question how to handle the case when the > host sets and arms some debug registers to debug the guest and the > latter does the same to debug itself. Guest access will be trapped, OK, > but KVM will then have to decide which value should actually be > transfered into the registers. Hmm, does SVM virtualizes all debug > registers, leaving the real ones to the host? >
There's no way this can work. There are still only four debug registers, and the guest and host together can ask for eight different addresses. It is theoretically doable by hiding all mappings to pages that are debug targets, but it would probably double the kvm code size. A good short-term compomise is to abort if the guest starts using enabling a debug address register. A better solution might be to place host debug addresses into unused guest debug registers, so that as long as nr_guest_debug + nr_host_debug <= 4, we can still proceed. -- Any sufficiently difficult bug is indistinguishable from a feature. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone _______________________________________________ kvm-devel mailing list kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
