There is no reason why should i386 and x86_64 code for rdtsc be different.
Unify them.
---
cpu-all.h | 11 +----------
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/cpu-all.h b/cpu-all.h
index 2a2b197..1c9e2a3 100644
--- a/cpu-all.h
+++ b/cpu-all.h
@@ -930,16 +930,7 @@ static inline int64_t cpu_get_real_ticks(void)
return ((int64_t)h << 32) | l;
}
-#elif defined(__i386__)
-
-static inline int64_t cpu_get_real_ticks(void)
-{
- int64_t val;
- asm volatile ("rdtsc" : "=A" (val));
- return val;
-}
-
-#elif defined(__x86_64__)
+#elif defined(__i386__) || defined(__x86_64__)
static inline int64_t cpu_get_real_ticks(void)
{
--
1.5.0.6
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference
Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100.
Use priority code J8TL2D2.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone
_______________________________________________
kvm-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
