Currently x86 is the only architecture that uses kvm_guest_init(). With
PowerPC we're getting a second user, but the signature is different there
and we don't need to export it, as it uses the normal kernel init framework.

So let's move the x86 specific definition of that function over to the x86
specfic header file.

Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <ag...@suse.de>
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_para.h |    6 ++++++
 include/linux/kvm_para.h        |    5 -----
 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_para.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_para.h
index 05eba5e..7b562b6 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_para.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_para.h
@@ -158,6 +158,12 @@ static inline unsigned int kvm_arch_para_features(void)
        return cpuid_eax(KVM_CPUID_FEATURES);
 }
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_KVM_GUEST
+void __init kvm_guest_init(void);
+#else
+#define kvm_guest_init() do { } while (0)
 #endif
 
+#endif /* __KERNEL__ */
+
 #endif /* _ASM_X86_KVM_PARA_H */
diff --git a/include/linux/kvm_para.h b/include/linux/kvm_para.h
index ac2015a..47a070b 100644
--- a/include/linux/kvm_para.h
+++ b/include/linux/kvm_para.h
@@ -26,11 +26,6 @@
 #include <asm/kvm_para.h>
 
 #ifdef __KERNEL__
-#ifdef CONFIG_KVM_GUEST
-void __init kvm_guest_init(void);
-#else
-#define kvm_guest_init() do { } while (0)
-#endif
 
 static inline int kvm_para_has_feature(unsigned int feature)
 {
-- 
1.6.0.2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm-ppc" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to