> -----Original Message----- > From: Alexander Graf [mailto:ag...@suse.de] > Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2013 3:21 PM > To: Caraman Mihai Claudiu-B02008 > Cc: kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org; k...@vger.kernel.org; linuxppc- > d...@lists.ozlabs.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] KVM: PPC: e500: Move VCPU's MMUCFG register > initialization earlier > > > On 30.01.2013, at 14:29, Mihai Caraman wrote: > > > VCPU's MMUCFG register initialization should not depend on > KVM_CAP_SW_TLB > > ioctl call. Move it earlier into tlb initalization phase. > > Quite the contrary. The fact that there is an mfspr() in e500_mmu.c > already tells us that the code is broken. The TLB guest code should only > depend on input from the SW_TLB configuration. It's completely orthogonal > to the host capabilities.
Then we have the same issue for TLBnCFG registers which need to be configured via SW_TLB ioctl. What is the purpose of guest tlb initalization in e500_mmu.c if we rely on SW_TLB? -Mike -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm-ppc" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
