On 15.07.2013, at 13:30, Gleb Natapov wrote: > On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 04:41:17PM +0530, Bharat Bhushan wrote: >> KVM_HC_VM_RESET: Requests that the virtual machine be reset. >> KVM_HC_VM_SHUTDOWN: Requests that the virtual machine be powered-off/halted. >> >> These hcalls are handled by guest userspace. >> >> Signed-off-by: Bharat Bhushan <bharat.bhus...@freescale.com> >> --- >> Documentation/virtual/kvm/hypercalls.txt | 16 ++++++++++++++++ >> include/uapi/linux/kvm_para.h | 3 ++- >> 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/Documentation/virtual/kvm/hypercalls.txt >> b/Documentation/virtual/kvm/hypercalls.txt >> index ea113b5..58acdc1 100644 >> --- a/Documentation/virtual/kvm/hypercalls.txt >> +++ b/Documentation/virtual/kvm/hypercalls.txt >> @@ -64,3 +64,19 @@ Purpose: To enable communication between the hypervisor >> and guest there is a >> shared page that contains parts of supervisor visible register state. >> The guest can map this shared page to access its supervisor register through >> memory using this hypercall. >> + >> +5. KVM_HC_VM_RESET >> +------------------------ >> +Architecture: PPC >> +Status: active >> +Purpose: Requests that the virtual machine be reset. The hcall takes no >> +arguments. If successful the hcall does not return. If an error occurs it >> +returns EV_INTERNAL. >> + >> +6. KVM_HC_VM_SHUTDOWN >> +------------------------ >> +Architecture: PPC >> +Status: active >> +Purpose: Requests that the virtual machine be powered-off/halted. >> +The hcall takes no arguments. If successful the hcall does not return. >> +If an error occurs it returns EV_INTERNAL. >> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/kvm_para.h b/include/uapi/linux/kvm_para.h >> index cea2c5c..218882d 100644 >> --- a/include/uapi/linux/kvm_para.h >> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/kvm_para.h >> @@ -19,7 +19,8 @@ >> #define KVM_HC_MMU_OP 2 >> #define KVM_HC_FEATURES 3 >> #define KVM_HC_PPC_MAP_MAGIC_PAGE 4 >> - >> +#define KVM_HC_VM_RESET 5 >> +#define KVM_HC_VM_SHUTDOWN 6 > There is no much sense to share hypercalls between architectures. There > is zero probability x86 will implement those for instance (not sure > why PPC will want them either instead of emulating devices that do > shutdown/reset
Implementing devices gets pretty tricky. Usually all of your devices sit on the SoC with a strictly defined layout. We can randomly shove some device in there, but there's a good chance we're overlapping with another device. So having a separate namespace with hcalls makes things a lot easier. And the guest needs to learn how to access it either way. > ). So lets move them to arch headers. Do we want to keep the numbering scheme interchangable? Maybe there will be hcalls that can get shared between archs? If so, leaving it in the same header file might make sense. Alex -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm-ppc" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
