On Thu, 2013-07-11 at 01:09 +0200, Alexander Graf wrote: > On 11.07.2013, at 01:08, Scott Wood wrote: > > > On 07/10/2013 06:04:53 PM, Alexander Graf wrote: > >> On 11.07.2013, at 01:01, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > >> > On Thu, 2013-07-11 at 00:57 +0200, Alexander Graf wrote: > >> >>> #ifdef CONFIG_PPC64 > >> >>> + /* > >> >>> + * To avoid races, the caller must have gone directly from having > >> >>> + * interrupts fully-enabled to hard-disabled. > >> >>> + */ > >> >>> + WARN_ON(local_paca->irq_happened != PACA_IRQ_HARD_DIS); > >> >> > >> >> WARN_ON(lazy_irq_pending()); ? > >> > > >> > Different semantics. What you propose will not catch irq_happened == 0 > >> > :-) > >> Right, but we only ever reach here after hard_irq_disable() I think. > > > > And the WARN_ON helps us ensure that it stays that way. > > Heh - ok :). Works for me.
What's the status on this patch? -Scott -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm-ppc" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
