On 04.11.2013, at 01:03, Scott Wood <scottw...@freescale.com> wrote:

> On Mon, 2013-11-04 at 07:56 +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>> On Sun, 2013-11-03 at 16:30 +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
>>> On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 10:18:19PM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>>> From: Bharat Bhushan <r65...@freescale.com>
>>>> 
>>>> This way we can use same data type struct with KVM and
>>>> also help in using other debug related function.
>>>> 
>>>> Signed-off-by: Bharat Bhushan <bharat.bhus...@freescale.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <ag...@suse.de>
>>> It would be nice to have PPC maintainers (CCed) ACKs here. This patch
>>> also has merging conflicts with cbc9565e (should be easy to resolve)
>> 
>> Is it easier if I put it in powerpc -next and resolve the conflicts ?
>> 
>> I was ok with the patch but yes, I should probably have put it in a
>> topic branch in the first place and merge it both in my tree and Alex.
> 
> It's already in your -next via my tree (sha1
> 51ae8d4a2b9e4aa9a502061b9c39168e08829b94).  I didn't realize Alex was
> planning on applying it.

Yeah, it's what Ben and me agreed on after I waited forever to get a topic 
branch created. Oh well, I guess this time we just have to manually resolve the 
conflicts and do a better job at communicating next time.


Alex

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm-ppc" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to