On Tue, 2014-05-20 at 21:56 +1000, Gavin Shan wrote:

 .../...

> >I think what you want is an irqfd that the in-kernel eeh code
> >notifies when it sees a failure. When such an fd exists, the kernel
> >skips its own error handling.
> >
> 
> Yeah, it's a good idea and something for me to improve in phase II. We
> can discuss for more later. For now, what I have in my head is something
> like this:

However, this would be a deviation from (or extension of) PAPR. At the
moment, the way things work in PAPR is that the guest is responsible for
querying the EEH state when something "looks" like an error (ie, getting
ff's back). This is also how it works in pHyp.

We have an interrupt path in the host when doing "native" EEH, and it
would be nice to extend PAPR to also be able to shoot an event to the
guest possibly using RTAS events, but let's get the basics working and
upstream first.

Cheers,
Ben.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm-ppc" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to