On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 02:18:53PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote: > Hi Joonsoo, > > On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 12:21:38PM +0900, Joonsoo Kim wrote: > > We don't need explicit 'CMA:' prefix, since we already define prefix > > 'cma:' in pr_fmt. So remove it. > > > > And, some logs print function name and others doesn't. This looks > > bad to me, so I unify log format to print function name consistently. > > > > Lastly, I add one more debug log on cma_activate_area(). > > When I take a look, it just indicates cma_activate_area was called or not, > without what range for the area was reserved successfully so I couldn't see > the intention for new message. Description should explain it so that everybody > can agree on your claim. >
Hello, I paste the answer in other thread. This pr_debug() comes from ppc kvm's kvm_cma_init_reserved_areas(). I want to maintain all log messages as much as possible to reduce confusion with this generalization. If I need to respin this patchset, I will explain more about it. Thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm-ppc" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
