On 10.07.14 15:07, Mel Gorman wrote:
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 01:05:47PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 09.07.14 00:59, Stewart Smith wrote:
Hi!
Thanks for review, much appreciated!
Alexander Graf <ag...@suse.de> writes:
On 08.07.14 07:06, Stewart Smith wrote:
@@ -1528,6 +1535,7 @@ static void kvmppc_run_core(struct kvmppc_vcore *vc)
int i, need_vpa_update;
int srcu_idx;
struct kvm_vcpu *vcpus_to_update[threads_per_core];
+ phys_addr_t phy_addr, tmp;
Please put the variable declarations into the if () branch so that the
compiler can catch potential leaks :)
ack. will fix.
@@ -1590,9 +1598,48 @@ static void kvmppc_run_core(struct kvmppc_vcore *vc)
srcu_idx = srcu_read_lock(&vc->kvm->srcu);
+ /* If we have a saved list of L2/L3, restore it */
+ if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_207S) && vc->mpp_buffer) {
+ phy_addr = virt_to_phys((void *)vc->mpp_buffer);
+#if defined(CONFIG_PPC_4K_PAGES)
+ phy_addr = (phy_addr + 8*4096) & ~(8*4096);
get_free_pages() is automatically aligned to the order, no?
That's what Paul reckoned too, and then we've attempted to find anywhere
that documents that behaviour. Happen to be able to point to docs/source
that say this is part of API?
Phew - it's probably buried somewhere. I could only find this
document saying that we always get order-aligned allocations:
http://www.thehackademy.net/madchat/ebooks/Mem_virtuelle/linux-mm/zonealloc.html
Mel, do you happen to have any pointer to something that explicitly
(or even properly implicitly) says that get_free_pages() returns
order-aligned memory?
I did not read the whole thread so I lack context and will just answer
this part.
There is no guarantee that pages are returned in PFN order for multiple
requests to the page allocator. This is the relevant comment in
rmqueue_bulk
/*
* Split buddy pages returned by expand() are received here
* in physical page order. The page is added to the callers and
* list and the list head then moves forward. From the callers
* perspective, the linked list is ordered by page number in
* some conditions. This is useful for IO devices that can
* merge IO requests if the physical pages are ordered
* properly.
*/
It will probably be true early in the lifetime of the system but the milage
will vary on systems with a lot of uptime. If you depend on this behaviour
for correctness then you will have a bad day.
High-order page requests to the page allocator are guaranteed to be in physical
order. However, this does not apply to vmalloc() where allocations are
only guaranteed to be virtually contiguous.
Hrm, ok to be very concrete:
Does __get_free_pages(..., 4); on a 4k page size system give me a 64k
aligned pointer? :)
Alex
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm-ppc" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
