On Thursday 12 November 2015 09:04 AM, David Gibson wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 10:28:46PM +0530, Aravinda Prasad wrote:
>> This patch modifies KVM to cause a guest exit with
>> KVM_EXIT_NMI instead of immediately delivering a 0x200
>> interrupt to guest upon machine check exception in
>> guest address. Exiting the guest enables QEMU to build
>> error log and deliver machine check exception to guest
>> OS (either via guest OS registered machine check
>> handler or via 0x200 guest OS interrupt vector).
>>
>> This approach simplifies the delivering of machine
>> check exception to guest OS compared to the earlier approach
>> of KVM directly invoking 0x200 guest interrupt vector.
>> In the earlier approach QEMU patched the 0x200 interrupt
>> vector during boot. The patched code at 0x200 issued a
>> private hcall to pass the control to QEMU to build the
>> error log.
>>
>> This design/approach is based on the feedback for the
>> QEMU patches to handle machine check exception. Details
>> of earlier approach of handling machine check exception
>> in QEMU and related discussions can be found at:
>>
>> https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2014-11/msg00813.html
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Aravinda Prasad <aravi...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> ---
>>  arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c            |   12 +++---------
>>  arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rmhandlers.S |   31 
>> +++++++++++--------------------
>>  2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c
>> index 2280497..1b1dff0 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c
>> @@ -859,15 +859,9 @@ static int kvmppc_handle_exit_hv(struct kvm_run *run, 
>> struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>>              r = RESUME_GUEST;
>>              break;
>>      case BOOK3S_INTERRUPT_MACHINE_CHECK:
>> -            /*
>> -             * Deliver a machine check interrupt to the guest.
>> -             * We have to do this, even if the host has handled the
>> -             * machine check, because machine checks use SRR0/1 and
>> -             * the interrupt might have trashed guest state in them.
>> -             */
>> -            kvmppc_book3s_queue_irqprio(vcpu,
>> -                                        BOOK3S_INTERRUPT_MACHINE_CHECK);
>> -            r = RESUME_GUEST;
>> +            /* Exit to guest with KVM_EXIT_NMI as exit reason */
>> +            run->exit_reason = KVM_EXIT_NMI;
>> +            r = RESUME_HOST;
>>              break;
>>      case BOOK3S_INTERRUPT_PROGRAM:
>>      {
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rmhandlers.S 
>> b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rmhandlers.S
>> index b98889e..672b4f6 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rmhandlers.S
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rmhandlers.S
>> @@ -147,7 +147,6 @@ END_FTR_SECTION_IFSET(CPU_FTR_ARCH_207S)
>>      addi    r1, r1, 112
>>      ld      r7, HSTATE_HOST_MSR(r13)
>>  
>> -    cmpwi   cr1, r12, BOOK3S_INTERRUPT_MACHINE_CHECK
>>      cmpwi   r12, BOOK3S_INTERRUPT_EXTERNAL
>>      beq     11f
>>      cmpwi   cr2, r12, BOOK3S_INTERRUPT_HMI
>> @@ -160,7 +159,6 @@ END_FTR_SECTION_IFSET(CPU_FTR_ARCH_207S)
>>      mtmsrd  r6, 1                   /* Clear RI in MSR */
>>      mtsrr0  r8
>>      mtsrr1  r7
>> -    beq     cr1, 13f                /* machine check */
>>      RFI
>>  
>>      /* On POWER7, we have external interrupts set to use HSRR0/1 */
>> @@ -168,8 +166,6 @@ END_FTR_SECTION_IFSET(CPU_FTR_ARCH_207S)
>>      mtspr   SPRN_HSRR1, r7
>>      ba      0x500
>>  
>> -13: b       machine_check_fwnmi
>> -
> 
> I don't quite understand the 3 hunks above.  The rest seems to change
> the delivery of MCs as I'd expect, but the above seems to change their
> detection and the reason for that isn't obvious to me.

We need to do guest exit here and hence we continue with RFI or else if
we branch to machine_check_fwnmi then the control will flow to
opal_recover_mce routine without causing the guest to exit with NMI exit
code. And I think, opal_recover_mce() is used to recover from UEs in
host user/kernel space and does not have a check for UEs belonging to
guest. Hence if we branch to machine_check_fwnmi we end up running into
panic() in opal_machine_check() if UE belonged to guest.

Regards,
Aravinda

> 
> 
>>  14: mtspr   SPRN_HSRR0, r8
>>      mtspr   SPRN_HSRR1, r7
>>      b       hmi_exception_after_realmode
>> @@ -2381,24 +2377,19 @@ machine_check_realmode:
>>      ld      r9, HSTATE_KVM_VCPU(r13)
>>      li      r12, BOOK3S_INTERRUPT_MACHINE_CHECK
>>      /*
>> -     * Deliver unhandled/fatal (e.g. UE) MCE errors to guest through
>> -     * machine check interrupt (set HSRR0 to 0x200). And for handled
>> -     * errors (no-fatal), just go back to guest execution with current
>> -     * HSRR0 instead of exiting guest. This new approach will inject
>> -     * machine check to guest for fatal error causing guest to crash.
>> -     *
>> -     * The old code used to return to host for unhandled errors which
>> -     * was causing guest to hang with soft lockups inside guest and
>> -     * makes it difficult to recover guest instance.
>> +     * Deliver unhandled/fatal (e.g. UE) MCE errors to guest
>> +     * by exiting the guest with KVM_EXIT_NMI exit reason (exit
>> +     * reason set later based on trap). For handled errors
>> +     * (no-fatal), go back to guest execution with current HSRR0
>> +     * instead of exiting the guest. This approach will cause
>> +     * the guest to exit in case of fatal machine check error.
>>       */
>> -    ld      r10, VCPU_PC(r9)
>> +    bne     2f      /* Continue guest execution? */
>> +    /* If not, exit the guest. SRR0/1 are already set */
>> +    b       mc_cont
>> +2:  ld      r10, VCPU_PC(r9)
>>      ld      r11, VCPU_MSR(r9)
>> -    bne     2f      /* Continue guest execution. */
>> -    /* If not, deliver a machine check.  SRR0/1 are already set */
>> -    li      r10, BOOK3S_INTERRUPT_MACHINE_CHECK
>> -    ld      r11, VCPU_MSR(r9)
>> -    bl      kvmppc_msr_interrupt
>> -2:  b       fast_interrupt_c_return
>> +    b       fast_interrupt_c_return
>>  
>>  /*
>>   * Check the reason we woke from nap, and take appropriate action.
>>
> 

-- 
Regards,
Aravinda

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm-ppc" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to