On Friday 30 May 2008 23:00:41 Farkas Levente wrote: > this is out production server at the development department (10-15) > people using it so actually if i tell them that i'll stop the host and > all guests for max an hour it's acceptable, but more not really. it's > run it type programs. from my experience in the last 6-12 months is that > kvm is not production ready. as you can read from this list there are > far too many change day-by-day which are very core. and this comes from > the current state of kvm. which indicate that rh can't include in there
You'll find the most stable version of kvm in the kernel that your distribution ships. Linux-2.6.x (where x > 20) should also be stable. The development on kvm will continue to proceed at a fast pace, so you'll see several kvm releases and this, as a result, is bound to bring in a few new bugs in each iteration. > imho the biggest problem with the current development of kvm that there > is not a stable releases which is somewhat related to the current > release number. eg kvm-0.5.x kvm-0.6.x would be better. but currently So the short answer is: if you're looking for a stable version of kvm, look at a kernel.org kernel or the kvm version provided to you by your distribution. > kvm development is so fast that keep 2-3 parallel branch where there is > a development and stable release seems to too much work. > so to answer to your question i don't know:-( The "stable" branch of kvm is the one in the most-recently available Linux kernel from kernel.org. kvm.git is the development version. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
