Glauber Costa wrote:
On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 5:39 AM, Avi Kivity <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Glauber Costa wrote:
diff --git a/target-i386/op_helper.c b/target-i386/op_helper.c
index 0b5fdc0..433aa3f 100644
--- a/target-i386/op_helper.c
+++ b/target-i386/op_helper.c
@@ -600,7 +600,7 @@ do {\
 #define PUSHL(ssp, sp, sp_mask, val)\
 {\
    sp -= 4;\
-    stl_kernel((ssp) + (sp & (sp_mask)), (val));\
+    stl_kernel((uint32_t)((ssp) + (sp & (sp_mask))), (uint32_t)(val));\
 }

Surly it is better to push this into the underlying virtual->physical
translation functions, so it applies everywhere?

btw, the cast is wrong for x86-64, so it must be qualified for 32-bit
operating modes.
The tests were all done with x86_64. This is a PUSHL macro, so it's
32-bit anyway.
A x86_64-only PUSHQ seems to do the right thing.


Right.

It's still odd to see this in an op helper rather than in somewhere generic.

--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to