Glauber Costa wrote:
Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
libkvm/libkvm.c | 4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/libkvm/libkvm.c b/libkvm/libkvm.c
index e768e44..fa65c30 100644
--- a/libkvm/libkvm.c
+++ b/libkvm/libkvm.c
@@ -130,8 +130,8 @@ int get_intersecting_slot(unsigned long phys_addr)
int i;
for (i = 0; i < KVM_MAX_NUM_MEM_REGIONS ; ++i)
- if (slots[i].len && slots[i].phys_addr < phys_addr &&
- (slots[i].phys_addr + slots[i].len) > phys_addr)
+ if (slots[i].len && slots[i].phys_addr <= phys_addr &&
+ (slots[i].phys_addr + slots[i].len) >= phys_addr)
return i;
return -1;
consider
slots[i].phys_addr = 0
slots[i].len = 1
phys_addr = 1
with the new calculation, i (well, not me personally) will be considered
an intersecting slot.
Not that I (me this time) can understand how you can calculate interval
intersection without the entire interval.
--
I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this
signature is too narrow to contain.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
