Hollis Blanchard wrote:
I wanted to make sure people on non-x86 architectures couldn't run into vring-size related problems that didn't also appear on x86.
Having a VRING_SHIFT and a VRING_PAGE_SIZE where VRING_PAGE_SIZE != (1 << VRING_SHIFT) is almost certainly going to break things in unexpected ways because it's going against common understanding of the relationship between shift and page_size.
Regards, Anthony Liguori -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
