Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> writes:

> Il 21/04/2014 15:20, Bandan Das ha scritto:
>> +    for (i = j = 0; i < max_shadow_read_write_fields; i++) {
>> +
>
> Extra empty line.  Not a big deal, but...
>
>> +            switch (shadow_read_write_fields[i]) {
>> +            case GUEST_BNDCFGS:
>> +                    if (!vmx_mpx_supported())
>> +                            continue;
>> +                    break;
>> +            default:
>> +                    break;
>> +            }
>> +
>> +            if (j < i)
>> +                    shadow_read_write_fields[j] =
>> +                            shadow_read_write_fields[i];
>> +            j++;
>
> ... you need to respin anyway because the j++ is wrong.  It should be
> inside the "if".  If you prefer, you can put it in the lhs of the

j++ outside the "if" looks right to me. Can you please explain why
you think it shouldn't be that way ?

> assignment, otherwise a separate statement is fine by me too.
>
> Paolo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to