Anthony Liguori <aligu...@amazon.com> writes: > On 04/22/14 07:35, Michael Roth wrote: >> Quoting Stefan Hajnoczi (2014-04-22 08:31:08) >>> On Wed, Apr 02, 2014 at 05:40:23PM -0700, Alex Davis wrote: >>>> and where is their gpg key? >>> >>> Michael Roth <mdr...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> is doing releases: >>> >>> http://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?op=vindex&search=0x3353C9CEF108B584 >>> >>> >>> > $ gpg --verify qemu-2.0.0.tar.bz2.sig >>> gpg: Signature made Thu 17 Apr 2014 03:49:55 PM CEST using RSA >>> key ID F108B584 gpg: Good signature from "Michael Roth >>> <fluks...@gmail.com>" gpg: aka "Michael Roth >>> <mdr...@utexas.edu>" gpg: aka "Michael Roth >>> <mdr...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>" >> >> Missed the context, but if this is specifically about 1.7.1: >> >> 1.7.1 was prior to me handling the release tarballs, Anthony >> actually did the signing and uploading for that one. I'm a bit >> confused though, as the key ID on that tarball is: >> >> mdroth@loki:~/Downloads$ gpg --verify qemu-1.7.1.tar.bz2.sig gpg: >> Signature made Tue 25 Mar 2014 09:03:24 AM CDT using RSA key ID >> ADF0D2D9 gpg: Can't check signature: public key not found >> >> I can't seem to locate ADF0D2D9 though: >> >> http://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?search=0xADF0D2D9&op=vindex >> >> Anthony's normal key (for 1.6.0 and 1.7.0 at least) was 7C18C076: >> >> http://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?search=0x7C18C076&op=vindex >> >> I think maybe Anthony might've signed it with a separate local >> key? > > Yeah, I accidentally signed it with the wrong key. Replacing the > signature doesn't seem like the right thing to do since release > artifacts should never change.
You could still publish the key, with some suitable signatures. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
