From: Thomas Huth <th...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
As a program status word is also invalid (and thus generates an
specification exception) if the instruction address is not even,
we should test this in is_valid_psw(), too. This patch also exports
the function so that it becomes available for other parts of the
S390 KVM code as well.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <th...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.h...@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntrae...@de.ibm.com>
---
arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.h | 1 +
arch/s390/kvm/priv.c | 5 ++++-
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.h b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.h
index c28423a..38b589d 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.h
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.h
@@ -142,6 +142,7 @@ void kvm_s390_reinject_io_int(struct kvm *kvm,
int kvm_s390_mask_adapter(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned int id, bool masked);
/* implemented in priv.c */
+int is_valid_psw(psw_t *psw);
int kvm_s390_handle_b2(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
int kvm_s390_handle_e5(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
int kvm_s390_handle_01(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/priv.c b/arch/s390/kvm/priv.c
index 07d0c10..d99f5f0 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kvm/priv.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/priv.c
@@ -365,7 +365,8 @@ static void handle_new_psw(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
#define PSW_ADDR_24 0x0000000000ffffffUL
#define PSW_ADDR_31 0x000000007fffffffUL
-static int is_valid_psw(psw_t *psw) {
+int is_valid_psw(psw_t *psw)
+{
if (psw->mask & PSW_MASK_UNASSIGNED)
return 0;
if ((psw->mask & PSW_MASK_ADDR_MODE) == PSW_MASK_BA) {
@@ -376,6 +377,8 @@ static int is_valid_psw(psw_t *psw) {
return 0;
if ((psw->mask & PSW_MASK_ADDR_MODE) == PSW_MASK_EA)
return 0;
+ if (psw->addr & 1)
+ return 0;
return 1;
}
--
1.8.4.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
