On 6 August 2014 18:18, Will Deacon <will.dea...@arm.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 05, 2014 at 09:49:55AM +0100, Anup Patel wrote:
>> Instead, of trying out each and every target type we should use
>> KVM_ARM_PREFERRED_TARGET vm ioctl to determine target type
>> for KVM ARM/ARM64.
>>
>> We bail-out target type returned by KVM_ARM_PREFERRED_TARGET vm ioctl
>> is not known to kvmtool.
>
> -ENOPARSE
OK, I will fix the wordings here.
>
>> Signed-off-by: Pranavkumar Sawargaonkar <pranavku...@linaro.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Anup Patel <anup.pa...@linaro.org>
>> ---
>> tools/kvm/arm/kvm-cpu.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++-----
>> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/kvm/arm/kvm-cpu.c b/tools/kvm/arm/kvm-cpu.c
>> index aeaa4cf..7478f8f 100644
>> --- a/tools/kvm/arm/kvm-cpu.c
>> +++ b/tools/kvm/arm/kvm-cpu.c
>> @@ -34,6 +34,7 @@ struct kvm_cpu *kvm_cpu__arch_init(struct kvm *kvm,
>> unsigned long cpu_id)
>> struct kvm_cpu *vcpu;
>> int coalesced_offset, mmap_size, err = -1;
>> unsigned int i;
>> + struct kvm_vcpu_init preferred_init;
>> struct kvm_vcpu_init vcpu_init = {
>> .features = ARM_VCPU_FEATURE_FLAGS(kvm, cpu_id)
>> };
>> @@ -46,6 +47,10 @@ struct kvm_cpu *kvm_cpu__arch_init(struct kvm *kvm,
>> unsigned long cpu_id)
>> if (vcpu->vcpu_fd < 0)
>> die_perror("KVM_CREATE_VCPU ioctl");
>>
>> + err = ioctl(kvm->vm_fd, KVM_ARM_PREFERRED_TARGET, &preferred_init);
>> + if (err < 0)
>> + die_perror("KVM_ARM_PREFERRED_TARGET ioctl");
>
> Is this ioctl always available? If not, I don't like dying here as that
> could cause a regression under older hosts.
The KVM_ARM_PREFERRED_TARGET ioctl is available from 3.13 onwards.
I think we should first try KVM_ARM_PREFERRED_TARGET. If it fails then
we should fallback to old method of trying each and every target type.
What say?
--
Anup
>
> Will
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
