Il 21/08/2014 14:50, Radim Krčmář ha scritto: > > > > > > All empty arch functions are in '.c' files, so it seems better to follow > > > the same path. > > > (And have one refactoring patch if GCC does not optimize this.) > > > > GCC certainly does not optimize this (unless you use LTO). > > I see LTO patches in next ... do we want to move every empty arch > function into headers?
I wouldn't reject the patches. (It would also save some lines of code, since in the headers it's common to do "static inline void foo(void) {}" on a single line). > (It is probably going to take LTO few years to be enabled by default.) Indeed... see also http://lwn.net/SubscriberLink/608945/7763ad2aee106f1d/ from today's LWN issue. Paolo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html